New England Patriots Super Bowl Champs

Tom Brady’s Agent: “More probable than not that the league cooperated with the Colts in perpetrating a sting operation.”

Tom Brady's agent releases a tough statement on The Wells Report

Tom Brady’s agent releases a tough statement on The Wells Report

Tom Brady’s agent Don Yee released a statement today on The Wells Report that was released yesterday.

The Wells Report implied that they believed Yee’s client was “at least generally aware of what was going on.” The report also said Brady did not turn over his cell phone during the investigation. The report used the phrase “more probable than not” that the Patriots equipment staff, tampered with the footballs and Brady knew about it.

Yee was disappointed with the outcome of the report and called it flawed.

He was not a happy camper, much like Kraft, who was nicer about his disappointment. I can’t blame Yee for the harshness of his statement because the Patriots haters are not holding back.

Here is the full statement from Mr. Don Yee.

“The Wells report, with all due respect, is a significant and terrible disappointment. It’s omission of key facts and lines of inquiry suggest the investigators reached a conclusion first, and then determined so-called facts later. One item alone taints this entire report. What does it say about the league office’s protocols and ethics when it allows one team to tip it off to an issue prior to a championship game, and no league officials or game officials notified the Patriots of the same issue prior to the game? This suggests it may be more probable than not that the league cooperated with the Colts in perpetrating a sting operation. The Wells report buries this issue in a footnote on page 46 without any further elaboration. The league is a significant client of the investigators’ law firm; it appears to be a rich source of billings and media exposure based on content in the law firm’s website. This was not an independent investigation and the contents of the report bear that out – all one has to do is read closely and critically, as opposed to simply reading headlines. The investigators’ assumptions and inferences are easily debunked or subject to multiple interpretations. Much of the report’s vulnerabilities are buried in the footnotes, which is a common legal writing tactic. It is a sad day for the league as it has abdicated the resolution of football-specific issues to people who don’t understand the context or culture of the sport. I was physically present for my client’s interview. I have verbatim notes of the interview. Tom made himself available for nearly an entire day and patiently answered every question. It was clear to me the investigators had limited understanding of professional football. For reasons unknown, the Wells report omitted nearly all of Tom’s testimony, most of which was critical because it would have provided this report with the context that it lacks. Mr. Wells promised back in January to share the results of this investigation publicly, so why not follow through and make public all of the information gathered and let the public draw its own conclusions? This report contains significant and tragic flaws, and it is common knowledge in the legal industry that reports like this generally are written for the benefit of the purchaser.”



Enjoyed this post?
Subscribe to Patriots Gab via RSS Feed or E-mail and receive daily news updates from us!

Submit to Digg  Stumble This Story  Share on Twitter  Post on Facebook  Post on MySpace  Add to  Bark It Up  Submit to Reddit  Fave on Technorati

Leave a Reply